![]() |
||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
full title Post-Installation Technique for the Client-centred Evaluation of Electronic Assistive Technology keywords Electronic Assistive Technology, risk analysis; risk management; independent living; telecare summary Electronic Assistive Technology (EAT) is now being more and more widely used as a way of enabling older and disabled people—generally referred to as clients—to live independently in their own homes. After the technology is installed, however, there is usually a settling in period during which the clients have to get used to the technology and how it works. The technology often affects the way that clients go about their everyday lives in ways that may be irritating, or problematic, and are sometimes not immediately obvious. In order to capture this impact of the technology, the post-installation technique (PIT) was developed, based on the risk management framework developed in earlier work on the DIRC project (see "Managing risk in the home"). The PIT enables clients (possibly with the help of a carer) to systematically think about how the EAT affects their everyday living, identifying the problems as they see them.
(a) do you find preparing food, eating,
and clearing up easier or are you more confident in doing it? B/P (b) do you find preparing food, eating,
and clearing up harder or are you less confident in doing it? B/P (c) are there new things you can do
now that you could not do before when preparing food, eating and clearing
up? B/P (d) are there things you can no longer do when preparing food, eating, and clearing up? B/P (e) are there new things you have to do now when preparing food, eating and clearing up that you did not need to do before? B/P (f) are there things you do in a different way when preparing food, eating and clearing up? B/P
Most EAT service providers carry out a routine assessment
approximately six months after the installation of an EAT system. The
PIT has designed in such a way that it can easily be integrated into
this assessment. papers Monk, A.F., Hone, K., Lines, L., Dowdall, A., Baxter, G.,
Blythe, M.B. and Wright, P. (2006) Towards a practical framework for
managing the risks of selecting technology to support independent living.
Author Gordon Baxter, G dot Baxter at psych dot york dot ac dot uk
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Page Maintainer: webmaster@dirc.org.uk | Credits | Project Members only | Last Modified: 4 October, 2006 | ||